What drives those who would criticise or condemn homeopathy, without having invested a significant amount of time and effort researching the topic? These are NOT scientists.

Is it fear? Is it insecurity? Is it a realisation that homeopathy may overturn so many paradigms, in which they have invested their careers and their confidence?

True science first observes, later draws conclusions or theories.

In ethical medicine, any methodology that claims that it may be able to help patients should be thoroughly investigated, not vilified out of hand.

Let us have science, not doctrine. Let us have patient welfare, not vested interest.

Please don't bother me with mindless vitriol and pseudoscience. Please observe first and then try to make sense of the observations.