This website came to my notice, yesterday: astorwilliam.tripod.com.

It contains reports of fascinating observations on finches, who appear to be able to self-medicate. Why not?

Zoopharmacognosy is the term coined to cover instinctive self-selection of medically-active substances by animals. I have long believed it to be an accepted phenomenon but came across surprisingly stubborn refusal to accept it in a court of law, about 18 months ago. It appears that the writer of this website has also encountered rooted disbelief.

Why anyone would disbelieve it is beyond me. It seems so much more likley to be the case than the alternative, that medicinal properties of herbs are found out by random coincidence.

One only has to look at the interesting observations of chimpanzees in Africa, whose 'medicinal practices' are followed by tribal peoples:

http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/pae/botany/botany_map/articles/article_04.html

http://www.uic.edu/classes/osci/osci590/8_1%20Chimpanzee%20Medicine%20Chest.htm

I once had a dog patient who used to pick at Pellitory-of-the-Wall, on regular visits to my clinic, but only on hot days. This is a 'cooling herb'!

[Why not take a look at www.alternativevet.org , while you're here?]

So there is to be a compromise on the Human-Animal Hybrid issue, when the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill comes to the Commons. Ministers and MPs whose consciences move them to oppose the Bill are to be allowed to melt away from the House, when it's time to vote. Some concession!

It appears that those who have voiced concern are men and women of conscience and this is unlikely to impress them. Pontius Pilate 'washed his hands' and hoped, thereby, to absolve himself of complicity. It didn't work and these men and women of conscience will be acutely aware of that, at this Eastertide.

I take my hat off to the Roman Catholic leaders of this country for speaking out, knowing the storm of protest and criticism that would follow. They have been led by their consciences.

Party Politics and Religion are not matters for my blog and I intend it to stay that way. Why has this issue been made a matter of party politics and the three-line whip? There's surely more to it than meets the eye.

I came across this item, this morning:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/03/09/do0907.xml

It argues that scientists have no wish to create hybrid monsters, in their research. I am sure that the scientists who split the atom (nuclear fission) likewise had no intention of annihilating Nagasaki and Hiroshima or of making nuclear war part of reality.

Pandora's Box* has been mentioned before, in my blogs. Here's another classic example. When scientists play with the substance of life and create part-human or mostly-human creatures, simply to perform experiments on them, they are unleashing forces they do not understand.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article3602832.ece

Sweeping generalisation, I know, but scientists appear to have a poor record when it comes to matters of conscience, decency, ethics and morality. They appear to consider themselves above such things, their 'scientific' motivation absolving them of any need to practice care or restraint. Pursuit of career and kudos are high on their agenda.

My motivation in writing this blog is fear of the forces that will be unleashed and distaste for governmental heavy tactics on issues that are not of political importance, yet are likely to affect us all, like it or not. Government is notoriously ignorant of true science.

*According to Ancient Greek mythology, Pandora opened a jar ('pithos', which has been later referred to as 'Pandora's Box'), releasing all the evils of mankind, leaving only hope inside once she had closed it again.

[Why not take a look at www.alternativevet.org , while you're here?]