Good old Professor Jim Stevenson. It appears that he has finally persuaded the FSA (Food Standards Agency) to 'toughen up' on the issue of the food additives, identified in his research that was published last September. He is clearly a scientist of principles. The health and welfare of our children (and animals) is a bigger concern than the commercial ambitions of food manufacturers.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/food-additives-could-be-as-damaging-as-lead-in-petrol-804890.html

"Apparently stung by the failure to act, Professor Jim Stevenson, who led the Southampton study, wrote to the FSA demanding immediate action."

"His letter dated 20 March is included in the bundle of documents forwarded to the board, which were published yesterday."

You may remember the original blog on this:

The many colours of our food

by Chris Day on Thu 06 Sep 2007 07:24 BST  

and here are some of the original reports:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/sep/06/lifeandhealth.health

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/06/nfood106.xml

Men of principle seem to be regrettably thin on the ground, these days, especially where academic and scientific careers may be at stake. I take my hat off to Prof. Stevenson for speaking out and for being so single-minded.

The implications of his work are there for animals, too and those responsible for feeding animals should be aware of the risks. All manner of colourings and other additives abound in pet foods, supplements and treats and the dangers should not be underestimated. This applies mostly to horses, dogs and cats. We even had a lovely Border Collie patient who was nearly put down, on account of developing unreliability with children, a behavioural change entirely abolished when colourants were removed from her diet.

http://www.alternativevet.org/nutrition.htm

From Sunday, 6th April, Local Authorities will have sole responsibility for dealing with stray dogs. The Police will now have no direct responsibility, which they hitherto shared with Local Authorities.

I don't know how much impact this will have on dog welfare or on the service provided, which was never sparkling in our region. We have always had to look after any stray dogs ourselves, if they came our way, to ensure their best possible chance of survival, 'repatriation' or re-homing.

Euthanasia has been one way of dealing with strays for Local Authorities and the RSPCA.

The Telegraph, The Times and the BBC have reported this issue in a balanced manner, with a variety of views and anxieties clearly expressed:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/04/04/eadogs104.xml

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7329807.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7330173.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_7320000/newsid_7329900/7329901.stm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3671195.ece

The Direct Gov website has a page on the subject of Stray Dogs, Dog Wardens etc., but is yet to be updated with details of the new arrangement, at the time of writing:

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndCommunity/InYourHome/AnimalsAndPets/DG_10026135

Is it a coincidence that the first website to come up on one particular Google search I did was that of the London Borough of Barking & Dagenham?

http://www.barking-dagenham.gov.uk/6-living/public-health/hcs-animal-stray-main.html

Joking apart, this site starkly lays out the obligations and powers of the Local Authority under the 'Environmental Protection (Stray Dogs) Regulations':

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1992/Uksi_19920288_en_1.htm

Legislation affecting dog ownership in the UK:

http://www.alternativevet.org/Laws%20for%20Dogs%20WS034-07.pdf

Other links:

Dogs Trust: http://www.dogstrust.org.uk/

Blue Cross: http://www.bluecross.org.uk/web/site/home/home.asp

[Why not take a look at www.alternativevet.org , while you're here?]